Last modified: 2006-08-26 by ian macdonald
Keywords: sarawak | malaysia | cross (black and red) | crown: antique | rajah | swallowtailed |
Links: FOTW homepage |
search |
disclaimer and copyright |
write us |
mirrors
5:7?
image
by Uros Zizmund
Flag adopted 7th May 1870, abolished 1946
See also:
The flag includes the yellow of Southeast Asian royalty note yellow, black and white in the Brunei flag [and the Thai royal flags].
Željko Heimer
I made the GIF according to the drawing in Talocci 1991.
Uros Zizmund, 16 September 1997
Gordon 1915 does not include the crown in his description of the Sarawak flag. National Geographic 1917 shows the version with the crown, and no mention of the merchant flag. National Geographic 1934 shows the old Sarawak Merchant Flag minus the crown. The text reads, "The merchant ships of Sarawak, whose present Rajah is Sir Charles Vyner Brooke, fly this striking combination of yellow, red, and black". Pedersen 1971 says the flag derives from the arms of the Brooke family, and does show the crown in the flag.
Nick Artimovich, 17 September 1997
On 7 May 1870 Sarawak changed into black the dark blue in the national flag and two days later adopted a State flag, which was also war ensign. This added an old style golden crown to the national flag. The design of the crown was, from the beginning, like the one used from 1963 until 1973. With British Admiralty permission of 20 June 1884, the Rajah's standard was modified. All these flags remained in use until 1946 when Sarawak became a colony.
Mario Fabretto, 18 September 1997
I am a Sarawakian and recently did a bit of research about Fort Margherita and the different flags that have flown there. (...) On 7th May, 1870, the first official notification regarding the Sarawak flag was issued by the second Rajah which contained the sentence "Black bunting to be used in place of blue".
Caroline Christina Teo, 6 March 1998
Flaggenbuch 1939 shows the government ensign with the same pattern, yellow field with a centered cross vertically divided red and black and a golden crown in center, but with a larger cross [and the crown somewhat different]. Proportions 7:11.
Ivan Sache, 17 January 2000
According to Flaggenbuch 1939
7:11
image
by Ivan Sache
5:7? image by Jorge Candeias and Uros Zizmund
With British Admiralty permission of 20 June 1884, the Rajah' standard was modified, becoming similar to the State flag but swallowtailed.
Mario Fabretto, 18 September 1997
The Personal Flag of the Rajah was swallow-tailed with crown and had parallel top and bottom edges with the fork of the swallow tail reaching back to the fly edge of the vertical arm of the cross. The red horizontal arm was split along both edges of the fork, diminishing in width to a point at the ends of the swallow tail.
Mario Fabretto, 2 October 1997
quoted by David Prothero, 22 July 1998
Flaggenbuch 1939 shows the Standard of the Rajah with the same pattern, yellow field with a centered cross vertically divided red and black, forked with red triangles along the fork mouth and a golden crown in center, [but the crown somewhat different]. Proportions 7:11.
Ivan Sache, 17 January 2000
According to Flaggenbuch 1939
7:11
image
by Ivan Sache
Flaggenbuch 1939 shows the government ensign with the same pattern, yellow field with a centered cross vertically divided red and black, but with a larger cross. Proportions 7:11.
Ivan Sache, 17 January 2000
According to Flaggenbuch 1939
7:11
image
by Ivan Sache
During the time the proportions of the flag changed so it is not possible to give them precisely.
Mario Fabretto, 18 September 1997
Probably the ratio was changed 7 May 1870 to 5:7 when the cross was changed to black-red. Mauro Talocci [Talocci 1982?] reports the flag adopted in 1870 as having a ratio 1:2.
Jaume Ollé, 2 November 1998
In 1906 the complete set of flags for Sarawak was (sizes in inches):
The width of the cross was, in all cases, one third the width of the flag. The iron crown was a very dark yellow, nearly brown. Not the same yellow as the field of the flag. Source: Answer to an Admiralty questionnaire in PRO [Public Record Office] document ADM 116/1063D.
David Prothero, 14 October 1999
Editor's note: all the above dimensions give the same proportion 2:3, neither 5:7 nor 1:2.